On the SAT Reading and Writing section, Inferences questions ask students to draw a conclusion the passage supports without stating it outright.
Students must combine details—why tools survive in one archaeological layer but not another, what a voice-matching experiment still shows after pauses are equalized, or what a shopkeeper will do after a quiet look at the ledger—and pick the completion that follows.
The exam typically offers a short text that trails off and asks which choice most logically completes it. Wrong answers overreach the evidence, ignore a leftover detail, or restate a fact instead of taking the next supported step.
Sample questions
Pick an answer to see whether it is right — nothing is saved, and nothing needs an account.
Question 1Mid
Archaeologists excavating a coastal settlement found almost no wooden fishing tools in dry upper layers but many such tools in a deeper, waterlogged layer. Stone sinkers occurred throughout the site, and impressions in hardened clay show that wooden tools had once been present in some upper-layer rooms. Excavators also recovered ceramic fragments and animal bones from both layers. This evidence suggests that
Which choice most logically completes the text?
Show answer
Answer: D — differences in preservation, rather than in tool use alone, help explain the layers’ different contents.
The clay impressions indicate that wooden tools existed in the upper layers even though the wood itself is gone. Waterlogging likely preserved wood in the deeper layer while wood decayed above.
Question 2Easier
A linguist proposed that listeners identify unfamiliar speakers partly by each speaker’s characteristic pauses. In recordings with the words unchanged, shortening every pause to the same duration made listeners much less accurate at matching voices to speakers. Their accuracy did not fall to chance, however. The findings indicate that
Which choice most logically completes the text?
Show answer
Answer: C — pause patterns aid speaker identification but are not the only cues listeners use.
Accuracy fell when distinctive pauses were equalized, so pause patterns help with speaker identification. Accuracy did not fall to chance, so listeners also use other cues and do not rely on pauses alone. Equalizing pauses changed accuracy rather than leaving it unchanged, and the study does not compare unfamiliar speakers with familiar ones.
Question 3Easier
The following text is from Lena Hartwell’s 2014 novel The Quiet Ledger.
The shopkeeper checked the figure entered for the gilt lamp in the day’s sales. It was a fraction of the lamp’s price; the apprentice had let it go for almost nothing. He reached for the ledger, then closed it and turned to the boy, who stood waiting. “Explain how the error occurred,” he said. When the apprentice had finished, the shopkeeper said, “You will design a system that keeps this from happening again.”
Based on the text, what is true about the shopkeeper?
Show answer
Answer: B — He values learning from the mistake more than immediately assigning blame.
The shopkeeper closes the ledger, asks the apprentice to explain the error, and then has him design a preventive system. Those actions show that he values learning from the mistake more than immediately assigning blame.
Study on the fly is an independent study tool and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by any testing organization, school, or government body.
SAT® is a registered trademark of the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, this product.
All practice questions and passages are original works created for Study on the fly and are not reproduced from any official test.